ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated cardiac electrical activation dynamics after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Although this procedure reduces morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients, many approaches attempting to identify the responders have shown that 30% of patients do not attain clinical or functional improvement. This study sought to quantify and characterize the effect of resynchronization therapy on the ventricular electrical activation of patients using body surface potential mapping, a noninvasive tool. METHODS: This retrospective study included 91 resynchronization patients with a mean age of 61 years, left ventricle ejection fraction of 28%, mean QRS duration of 182 ms, and functional class III/IV (78%/22%); the patients underwent 87-lead body surface mapping with the resynchronization device on and off. Thirty-six patients were excluded. Body surface isochronal maps produced 87 maximal/mean global ventricular activation times with three regions identified. The regional activation times for right and left ventricles and their inter-regional right-to-left ventricle gradients were calculated from these results and analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskall-Wallis test were used for comparisons, with the level of significance set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: During intrinsic rhythms, regional ventricular activation times were significantly different (54.5 ms vs. 95.9 ms in the right and left ventricle regions, respectively). Regarding cardiac resynchronization, the maximal global value was significantly reduced (138 ms to 131 ms), and a downward variation of 19.4% in regional-left and an upward variation of 44.8% in regional-right ventricular activation times resulted in a significantly reduced inter-regional gradient (43.8 ms to 17 ms). CONCLUSIONS: Body surface potential mapping in resynchronization patients yielded electrical ventricular ...
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Body Surface Potential Mapping/methods , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Heart Failure/therapy , Bundle-Branch Block/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Function, Right/physiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A terapia de ressincronização cardíaca (TRC) é procedimento já incorporado às diretrizes do tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca crônica grave. Os efeitos sobre a repolarização ventricular são controversos e seu comportamento ainda precisa ser melhor definido por meios não invasivos. OBJETIVO: Analisar o comportamento da repolarização ventricular, através do mapeamento eletrocardiográfico de superfície (MES), em pacientes sob TRC. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 52 pacientes sob TRC com indicação classe I das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Dispositivos Cardíacos Eletrônicos Implantáveis-2007, com idade média 58,8±12,3 anos, 31 homens, FEVE:27,5±9,2 e QRS:181,5±24,2ms. Foram excluídos os que não eram classe I e também os que usavam amiodarona, portadores de fibrilação atrial, marcapasso ou CDI prévios. O MES de 87 derivações (59 no tórax anterior e 28 no dorso) foi realizado em ritmo sinusal (BASAL) e sob efeito do ressincronizador (BIV) Através de medidas semiautomáticas foram obtidos o intervalo QT, QTc médio e a dispersão de QT (DQT) global das 87 derivações, nos dois modos de estimulação, em cada paciente. As mesmas medidas foram realizadas e comparadas nas três regiões discriminadas pelo MES (VD, Septo e VE). Caracterizamos assim, o comportamento global e regional do QT e sua dispersão na TRC. Utilizamos os testes t Student pareado e ANOVA para comparações múltiplas. Nível de significância de p< 0,05. RESULTADOS: O comportamento global do QTmédio foi sensivelmente menor em BIV que no BASAL (424,4±38,7 x 455,8±46,5ms; p<0,001), assim como o QTc médio (460,7±42,3 x 483,8±41,4ms; p<0,05) e a DQT (61,2±26,2 x 74,9±28,7ms; p<0,05). O QTmédio foi semelhante nas 3 regiões nos modos BASAL e BIV (p=ns), porém o QTc médio nas regiõess VD e VE mostrou-se significantemente menor no modo BASAL. Sob BIV, essa diferença foi notavelmente menor na região do VD...
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an already established procedure, which became part of the guidelines for severe chronic heart failure treatment. Its effects upon the ventricular repolarization are controversial, therefore CRT response still remains to be better defined by noninvasive methods. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the ventricular repolarization response by body surface potential mapping (BSPM) in patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing CRT, mean age 58.8±12.3 years, 31 male, LVEF 27.5±9.2 and QRS duration 181.5±14.2ms, with indication class I of the 2007Guidelines for Implantable Electronic Cardiac Devices of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology, were studied. Those who were not in class I and/or in use of amiodarone, with atrial fibrillation, or with previous pacemaker or ICD, were excluded. Eighty-seven-lead BSPM examination (59 leads on the anterior chest and 28 on the back) was performed in sinus rhythm (BASELINE), and in biventricular pacing (BIV) with the resynchronization device on. Global values of QT and mean QTc intervals, and QT dispersion (DQT) were semiautomatically measured in all patients in the two pacing modes. Same measurements were made and compared in the three regions (RV, Septum and LV) discriminated by BSPM maps. Thus we characterized the global and regional QT response and its dispersion under CRT. t-Student paired test and ANOVA were used for multiple comparisons. Significance level: p<.05. RESULTS: The global mean QT response was considerably smaller in BIV pacing than in BASELINE (424.4±38.7 x 455.8±46.5ms; p<.001), and so were the mean QTc (460.7±42.3 x 483.8±41.4ms; p<.05) and DQT (61.2±26.2 x 74.9±28.7ms; p<.05). Mean QT was similar across the three regions in both pacing modes (p=ns); however, mean QTc in RV and LV regions was found to be significantly smaller in BASELINE. In BIV pacing such difference was considerably smaller in the RV region...